Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Cinema Voyage - Akito Hirata, Filmhunter

 

Inception

July 21st 2010 06:07
"A single idea from the human mind can build cities. An idea can transform the world and rewrite all the rules. Which is why I have to steal it."


After first seeing The Matrix back in 1999, director Darren Aronofsky left asking “What kind of science fiction movie can people make now?” It was as if the sci-fi genre had reached its creative limitations, as though every one of its darkest, previously unexplored corners had been blown up with the daring suggestion that we might be living in a computer simulation. To quote Aronofsky again, “suddenly Philip K. Dick’s ideas no longer seemed that fresh.” And indeed, Aronofsky was not alone in expressing such concerns.


Yet, in the ten plus years that have now passed, we have seen sci-fi’s development and it thankfully renders Aronofsky’s remarks premature. Gems like Children of Men and Sunshine showcased new talent and Oscar winning potential for their respective creators Alfonso Cuaron and Danny Boyle. Then there are the more recent debuts of Duncan Jones’ Moon and Neill Blomkamp’s District 9, both stunning and original in their own rights. And, somehow, it doesn’t feel right without giving mention to Avatar. This year’s sterling addition to the canon of sci-fi is without question Christopher Nolan’s Inception, an ingenious actioner that blends exhilarating special effects with the same sort of conceit all great sci-fi possess, the paradoxical question and answer to What If?


In the film’s earliest and most visually gripping sequence, Leonardo DiCaprio insightfully observes “Dreams feel real while we’re in them. It’s only when we wake up that we realise something was actually strange.” Wise words for his listener, college student Ariadne, who is perfectly cast as Juno’s Ellen Page. She serves as the function of the audience as she is speedily swept into the dangerous machinations of Dom Cobb (DiCaprio) which force her further and further away from her reality. Cobb is called by himself and others the Extractor, a fitting euphemism for a criminal mastermind who steals from the dreams he unwelcomingly enters into.

The fiendishly intricate workings to seeing this dream-hacking method through run the risk of exhausting the audience’s intelligence. Put in the hands of a director less experienced and talented as Nolan, and the first half of Inception could be as uninspiring as your high school biology class on the structure of a plant cell. Nolan though has a knowing way of engaging our intrigue, in allegorising the labyrinth of the subconscious. And, in any case, this is of course all a brilliant plot device, a clever excuse, for some riveting and genuinely thrilling effects.

We are plunged into a time warp with Dom and his team, whose chief purpose by now is not to steal but rather to implant an idea in the mind of Mr Fischer (Cillian Murphy). With each layer of reality or unreality scraped away, temporal dislocation sets in and the stakes get higher with every passing second. Eternal entrapment disguises itself as a second chance for its most gullible leader and our tortured hero, Dom. The romantic subplot of his lost wife Mallorie (Marion Cotillard) evokes much pathos and forges for the audience an emotional connection to DiCaprio, who’s in top form to lead one of the slickest casts all year.

The film sources much of its originality from its dream-within-a-dream ploy. This is, as we know however, not something that Nolan first thought of. The scene in which Ariadne finds herself in a shared dream with Dom perhaps best invites comparison with The Matrix and its long line of imitators. Nevertheless, Inception works on many levels. It’s a vividly dream-like chess game which feels as though Asimov could have written it. And whilst this review has placed it squarely within the confines of sci-fi, knowing that the Godfathers of the genre would be proud, non-sci-fi fans will get a kick out of this too. After all, Nolan has made his name in large part due to his unfailing ability to hold our suspense.

Do yourself a massive favour, even if it’s only to say that you’ve seen a film this year that is not a sequel, remake or adaptation, and go watch Inception. The IMAX is heartily recommended.

5 STARS

Inception is released nationally tomorrow
79
Vote
   


Review - Surrogates

October 27th 2009 17:35
The question, "if a movie was made about your life, who would play the starring role" is deemed irrelevant in the world of Surrogates as your surrogate of choice would essentially play yourself. But admittedly it wouldn't be much of a life, as you are wired up in bed, watching your life play out before you. It may be glamourous for a while but in the long term it must get terribly dull not being able to associate with real human beings.

Bruce Willis is suffering from this dilemma. He is policeman Tom Willis who uses a surrogate (complete with a head of hair) to perform his day to day duties protecting his real self from the danger and action his job entails. However Tom is not happy. He is grieving after the death of his son and is hungering for some real life attention from his wife Maggie (Rosamund Pike) who is hooked on the use of surrogacy for all facets of her life. Her and everyone else it seems as we are informed that 98% of the world's population uses a surrogate - yes you will need to suspend your belief to even imagine that this could occur.

When the death of two surrogates causes the death of their owners then an immediate investigation takes place headed up by Tom and his partner Peters (Radha Mitchell). Up until this incident it was thought that a death of the surrogate would automatically flip a fail-safe switch protecting the owner from being hurt or injured.

By way of investigation we are introduced to Dreads - humans who refuse to adopt to the change and who live exiled from the surrogate inhabited world. Lead by The Prophet (Ving Rhames) it seems that this particular group has turned rogue ready to undertake a rebellion on the rest of the society. What the movie fails to present is a happy medium - but maybe there just isn't one. There are those who are addicted to the use of surrogates and those that do not want to get involved marking themselves as extremists against the robot cloned world.

Directed by Jonathan Mostow (Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines), the movie certainly generates some fabulous looking concepts and scenes. I felt however that it could have dealt more into the surrogate vs human aspect rather than heading directly down the action route but then again this is a Bruce Willis vehicle and action is what he does.

I enjoy intelligent sci-fi movies and one of my all time favourites is Kathryn Bigelow's Strange Days (1995). The idea of hooking up to other people's experiences like a drug could have been delved into further in this movie particularly when the surrogate you inhabit may not resemble your true self at all. Grey territory indeed!

"Still no official word on when, or if, surrogate services can be restored. It appears, at least for now... that we are on our own." Let's hope it stays that way for a while longer!

Voyage Review: 3/5

Check out the preview below:

64
Vote
   


Review - District 9

October 3rd 2009 04:27
District 9 may have left me with a lot of unanswered questions but in my mind it didn't particularly matter. I enjoyed District 9 over and above any other movie I have seen recently and was thoroughly entertained by Neill Blomkamp's take on the sci-fi genre. Aliens have been appearing in film ever since Georges Méliès 1902 silent film Le voyage dans la lune and District 9 truly earns the right to be a part of the genre.

Presented as a documentary, the Peter Jackson backed film is set in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Stranded, malnourished and unable to relocate their alien craft, aptly named "prawn" like aliens are given food and shelter while being nursed to health. 20 years later and long forgotten by the rest of the world, the alien camp District 9, has turned into a poverty stricken slum. Locals are unhappy about the location of the aliens and the South African government is forced to take action as the rest of the world looks on. The government in all their wisdom hires Multi-National United (MNU) to take charge of a large scale relocation operation to move them to a less human inhabited area, District 10.

The hero of the tale is Wikus Van De Merwe (a fantastic Sharlto Copley), an unlikely and seemingly incapable person given charge of the task. Due to his marriage ties, he is nonetheless responsible for notifying the prawns of their upcoming eviction. MNU and in particular, Wikus, are unprepared for the task and a little gung-ho in their approach. Chaos thus ensues and Wikus in his clumsiness becomes infected with a liquid which causes him to turn "prawn".

The infection is slow at first but when the appearance of an alien arm appears, both MNU and the neighbouring Nigerian gangs are pleased with the result. The aliens were certainly not unprepared for battle upon their arrival as their weapons suggest. Although 20 years on and apparent failure to study the mechanics behind the alien weaponry is met with frustration and despair. Only alien DNA is able to operate the equipment and the government and the Nigerians are quick to connect Wikus' affliction as the solution to their problem.

Meanwhile the aliens have been biding their time, largely ignored, trying to find a way to get their craft back to the mother ship to ultimately rescue the stranded aliens. Part social commentary with a lot of black humour and gore, District 9 is a movie that manages to be something without particularly trying to be much of anything.

The battlefield may be muddied at times but it is clear in the end who the bad guys are! Highly recommended for sci-fi and action fans alike.

Voyage Review: 4/5

Preview shown below:

49
Vote
   


Review: Slaughterhouse-Five

September 20th 2009 03:17
The Time Traveller's Wife is still on my list to catch at the cinema although in it's absence I thought I would review Slaughterhouse-Five. It was actually made in 1972 movie and focusses on a man who becomes unstuck in time, travelling through time and space.

Based on Kurt Vonnegut's novel of the same name, Slaughterhouse-Five was well received winning the Jury Prize at the Cannes Film Festival and earning a Golden Globe nomination for the lead actor Michael Sacks. Interestingly enough, Sacks only remained in the industry for 12 years and retired from acting in 1984 to pursue a career in Technology


[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


Review - Knowing

June 23rd 2009 15:00
Living in a foreign country abroad, we miss the trailers for all up and coming flicks. So it was with hesitation when I decided to sit down and watch Nicolas Cage's latest release - Knowing - as I had no idea what it was about. Very ironic but true!

Nicolas Cage is John Koestler, a widower, an astrophysicist and MIT professor whose son, Caleb (Chandler Canterbury), attends the local elementary school. John is not a believer in god or any form of christianity despite the fact that his estranged father is a pastor and that his son has a name overflowing with Christian undertones. (Caleb, biblically speaking, was an important figure in the Hebrew Bible, noted for his faith in God and was only one of two adult Israelites allowed to enter Canaan as a reward for their faith.) Early on in the piece we learn that the only philosophy he comes to rely on is the fact that "s**t happens


[ Click here to read more ]
70
Vote
   


Review - Push

June 5th 2009 03:37
Movers, Pushers, Watchers, Bleeders, Sniffs, Shifters, Wipers, Shadows and Stitchers. What do you want to be when you grow up?

Just to give you the lowdown and to avoid any possible confusion of which there may be much: Movers can manipulate objects; Pushers put thoughts, feelings and memories into the heads of others; Watchers can foresee the future; Bleeders emit high frequency sonic vibrations that can rupture blood vessels; Sniffs are like bloodhounds using their nose to locate people or objects; Shifters can temporarily shift patterns of light on any object to create illusions; Wipers erase your memory either on a permanent or temporary basis; Shadows can block visions of others; and Stitchers can heal or unheal by reconstructing cells on touch


[ Click here to read more ]
39
Vote
   


Akito Hirata's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Akito Hirata
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]